Beware the loyalty scheme rebrand

/v/r/r/Michael5.jpg

Let Starbucks and Avios be cautionary tales. The first rule of rebranding a loyalty scheme is not to turn your biggest fans against you.

Like any global brand with its finger on the pulse, one can only assume that Starbucks marketers keep a careful eye on Marketing Week readers’ online comments. So it comes as a surprise that Starbucks has made the same mistakes as Avios, previously AirMiles, when overhauling its loyalty card programme

Starbucks introduced its rebranded scheme, My Rewards, on 5 January and immediately prompted calls of foul play from existing card holders. Despite the coffee company’s vice president of marketing Brian Waring telling Marketing Week that “no-one will lose benefits”, irate customers took to our comment boards and Starbucks’ own Facebook page to protest that they were indeed worse off.

One Marketing Week commenter claimed that changes to the terms and conditions would cost £240 over the year on regular coffee orders. Others complained they could no longer get money off a filter coffee, with that benefit replaced by “customisation” options of no interest to them.

Starbucks appears to have fallen into the same trap as Avios (previously AirMiles) did. It has quietly taken away benefits without appreciating that no-one knows the terms and conditions of its loyalty scheme better than the loyal members who use it. And customers have responded with similar anger.

In any rewards programme, there will always be a group of customers who value most the offer that marketers consider most obscure or least profitable. But when someone invests time and money in sticking with a brand only to have that offer taken away, it will feel like a broken promise.

In a second, your most valuable customers can become your most ardent critics. They will also be the people most likely to voice an opinion thanks to phenomenon informally known as the ‘Marmite distribution’ - only those who love or hate something care enough to comment about it on the internet.

The very reason that databases amassed through loyalty schemes are so valuable is that they contain the details of customers who are likely to purchase consistently and repeatedly. In the competitive coffee market, it should be a cardinal rule to keep these customers on-side. As research by Costa has found, the most frequent coffee drinkers are likely to use more than one brand, so once-loyal customers are likely to take flight, given sufficient cause.

Every marketer knows the value inherent in loyalty scheme data, but that data will become less valuable if you forget that “loyalty” is more than just a marketing strategy.

Have you used data to drive exceptional ROI this year? Then enter the Marketing Week Engage Awards 2012 by clicking here

Readers' comments (5)

  • It's not only the loss of the old benefits though, it's the terrible implementation of the new ones. It now takes 15 stars to get a free drink, and it's a star per transaction. This makes it the same "benefit" whether you buy the cheapest thing on their menu or spend over 20 quid on food, drink and take away beans etc. How is this fair?.... How is this even possible to come out of a marketing think tank?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Great piece. Something else to add. Starbucks states it's a more inclusive reward programme, yet now you won't get rewarded your star in the many non-company owned Starbucks Stores nationwide. Only company owned stores will recognise this new more inclusive programme.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Very succinct Michael - Perhaps Starbucks would do well to sack their current marketing team and recruit you!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Wow. And Starbucks just managed to call their customers stupid on their facebook wall. Way to go, guys!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If customers can now only earn one reward star per transaction - rather than per drink - let's hope they buy their multiple drink orders individually and clog up the queues... Starbucks will realise the stupidity of this move pretty quickly.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

Related images

Job of the Week

Top Jobs

social+media Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
knowledge+bank