Funny and entertaining adverts are most effective reveals survey
Funny and entertaining adverts are most effective, according to 59% of consumers surveyed by Harris Interactive and LinkedIn.

A poll on the social media site revealed that whilst consumer and advertiser opinion is split regarding just how effective different types of adverts are, advertisers and their audiences do tend to agree on what types of ad are most and least persuasive.
The vast majority of advertisers said they are confident about their ads, with typically 8 or 9 out of ten believing in the effectiveness of their work. However, when asked what types of ads they felt they were likely to remember, consider the product or buy the brand, consumers were significantly more reluctant to suggest that they were likely to be swayed by advertising.
Despite this, while the public tends to be cynical about ad effectiveness, advertisers and their audiences do tend to agree on what types of ad are most effective and least effective.
From a range of ten types of ad, those which are funny / entertaining are ranked the most effective by the public and came second by advertisers. Ads that make people stop and think are ranked first by advertisers and fourth by the public.
Ads that give new information are ranked joint second by the public and joint third by advertisers. ‘Old fashioned’ benefit illustration advertising, showing how the product works or how it will benefit the consumer, is less in favour with advertisers ranked fifth but still much appreciated by consumers who rank them joint second.
However, male and female attitudes towards this differ, with women more likely to agree strongly on their effectiveness (15%) than men (9%). For many products and purchases this type of advertising clearly has an important role still to play.
The ads regarded as least effective by consumers and advertisers are ads about serious topics (ranked ninth by the public and tenth by advertisers), though clearly subjects which require a serious tone do have their place, and ads which reinforce already known messages were ranked seventh by the public and ninth by advertisers.
Consumers regard TV as the medium in which they are most likely to see ads that are repeated too many times (63% selecting TV over radio 22%, online 8% and print 7%).







Readers' comments (4)
Mike Comer | Thu, 4 Mar 2010 2:32 pm
A very interesting read, but what about clever advertising like "Honda"?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Dan O'Day | Sat, 6 Mar 2010 9:30 pm
The opinion poll cited asks a question that is irrelevant to serious advertisers.
"What types of ads are you most likely to remember, are most likely to make you consider buying or to buy the product?"
Meaningless.
A direct correlation between exposure to a specific ad campaign and an increase in sales?
Valuable.
Dan O'Day
http://danoday.com
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
NC | Fri, 21 May 2010 7:39 pm
I was watching tv a second ago, but now the "ads" are on in full strength...
Not going to waste much time with this, but thought to leave a note.
90% of the ads on tv this days put me off from buying the products advertised....
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
John Howlett | Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:44 pm
It's ironic, the more outrageous or funny the ad,
the shorter its life.After all how many times can you be surprised or laugh at the end of a wild and crazy TV spot. If a client is brave enough to go the "lets do something different" route they should commit to 10 or 12 spots over the course of 12-24 months.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment