When rebrands go wrong

(And how to avoid the pitfalls)

Diageo chief and ASA slam alcohol misuse proposals

Diageo has hit back at the proposals in today’s Health Select Committee report that posits greater restrictions on alcohol pricing and promotion

Diageo

Simon Litherland, managing director of Diageo GB, owner of brands such as Smirnoff and Guinness, says: “We recognise that alcohol misuse is a matter of serious concern for us all, but we are extremely disappointed by the committee’s divisive approach. This report represents yet another attempt by aggressive sections of the health lobby to hijack alcohol policy-making. It seeks to marginalise the role of industry in helping to tackle the problem of alcohol misuse.

He adds that many of the population wide measures proposed by the Committee today (8 January) would punish responsible drinkers but do nothing to address the minority of problem drinkers.

“Over a third of alcohol is consumed by less than a tenth of the population, which clearly suggests that targeted interventions would be much more effective and appropriate.”

He says that proposals for minimum pricing, at 50p per unit and duty increases are based on the false notion that higher prices will reduce excessive consumption amongst those groups most at risk but there is little evidence to support this and the Committee itself was divided on the efficacy of this approach.

Litherland is also disturbed by the “disproportionate focus” on spirits and points out that the Committee’s recommendations on duty, were they to be adopted, could potentially double the price of a bottle Bell’s, the UK’s favourite Scotch whisky, to around £23.

“The draconian proposals on alcohol advertising and sponsorship lack a credible evidence base. They amount to an effective ban, which would have serious repercussions for the sports concerned, the media and advertising industries.

“Fundamentally, we believe that the committee has missed an opportunity to identify policies that will really make a difference. They have recommended blunt top down legislative solutions, which overlook the proven effectiveness of a partnership approach across a wide range of stakeholders, including industry.”

The drinks industry is working alongside The Drinkaware Trust on a £100 million five-year Campaign for Smarter Drinking initiative , which aims to change the current drinking culture in the UK.

Other bodies supportive of self-regulation in the marketing and promotion of alcohol have spoken out. The Advertising Standards Authority, which regulates all non-broadcast advertising says: “As a regulator the ASA is independent of both Government and industry… the UK’s advertising regulatory regime for alcohol is one of the strictest in the world. The ASA regularly upholds complaints against major companies, demonstrating that the mandatory Codes are strictly applied.

“It is difficult to see what the benefits of a fragmented regulatory system might be - the regulatory system for advertising is already quick and effective in responding to public concerns and having problem ads withdrawn.”

Paul Sullivan, marketing director at brewery Wadworth, says: “Alcohol is a cultural issue and needs to be addressed as such over a period of time. The management of the few who drink to excess and are responsible for anti social behaviour will not be through reduction in music sponsorship or public health adverts or back label messages, but grass roots education and sensible implementation of the licensing laws already in place. Clearly alcohol is the new tobacco and today’s research will be yesterday’s hokum.

“Marketing needs to be sensible in the way it portrays alcohol especially if we want our drinkers to treat our product sensibly. If the reality is that brands are truly the domain of the consumer rather than the marketer which is my understanding then the solution to the alcohol issue is the re-education of the consumer from an early age. Over control will lead to increased desire by the parties that aren’t supposed to have it and small clubs, teams, festivals and communities that operate at the bottom end of the marketing spectrum will suffer.”

Readers' comments (4)

  • Why not close down all Pubs, Clubs etc. Also ban the sale of Tobacco & Alcohol in every form… “Let’s all be treated like naughty Children? “ I am a pensioner and like my odd pint, all my life I have used what they call self-discipline, smoked at one time and given it up without any help!!. So why on earth should we be forced to pay overboard for my pint or two? “Very demoralising” Could say more but whats the point?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The first comment from Anonymous is typical of 99% of people who drink in this country without the need for Government intervention.

    No one, least the alcohol industry, wants to encourage people to drink excessively, but any regulations will inevitably hit the "average" and majority responsible drinker, and harm an industry already tied up in knots by Government regulation incompetence and over taxation.

    Gone are the days where the "perfect picture" of middle England was a man sitting with a pint smoking a pipe, outside a pub overlooking a game of cricket on the village green. Particularly if the village cricket team is sponsored by the local brewery!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree with Diageo, Raising the price of Alcohol will not affect the small minority of people from binge drinking, there is evidence for this. It is a purely cultural thing which will take a lot of time to break down in order to change. I have just finished my Advertising and Marketing Degree, and am currently studying my Masters, and it is clear to see a very basic principle in action. This being the components of an attitude, and all 3 parts of the model (http://images.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://www.usm.maine.edu/psy/gayton/102/102-cv/images/attitude.gif&imgrefurl=http://www.usm.maine.edu/psy/gayton/102/102-cv/7_04c.htm&usg=__G6TOSUSBUFdhTrMU2W0i2ReCL8U=&h=331&w=544&sz=7&hl=en&start=1&um=1&tbnid=EfilPIsqaKRWSM:&tbnh=81&tbnw=133&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dcomponents%2Bof%2Battitude%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN%26um%3D1) point away from the attitude of having 1 or two, towards the lets drink to get drunk measure. This will take a long time to change but i think the corporations have taken steps in the right direction by almost vilifying loutish behavior and making it unacceptable. Helping essentially to break down the first layers of the attitude, decreasing price will only set this back or at worse create a reverse effect.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • People in the south east are encouraged to go to www.bigdrinkdebatese.org.uk/manifesto and vote on which aspects of the alcohol manifesto they’d like to be see developed further in the region. The manifesto is live until the 31st January so don’t miss out on the opportunity to make your voice heard.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

Related images


Job of the Week

Top Jobs

social

+media Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
knowledge+bank