P&G aiming for gold with Olympic partnership

Marc Pritchard
Procter & Gamble (P&G) hopes its sponsorship of the Olympic Games will help its brands reach almost a billion new customers over the next five years. P&G global marketing and brand building officer Marc Pritchard tells Marketing Week how this will be achieved and how the partnership will be leveraged.
The Gillette and Duracell maker signed a decade-long deal with the International Olympic Committee yesterday (28 July). The agreement spans five Olympic Games starting with the London Games in 2012, before moving onto Russia in 2014 and Brazil in 2016.
Pritchard says that its plans for a “far-reaching” programme around the Games will help accelerate growth in developing markets and extend its reach in the territories where its brands are already strong.
“This [the Olympic partnership] allows us to reach the 4.2 billion consumers we already reach and puts us on our way to the 5 billion goal we have in the next five years.
“It really allows us to touch more consumers with our brands. It will also increase the favourability of our brands and the favourability of our company and of course build our business,” he adds.
Pritchard’s confidence stems from P&G successful experience at the Vancouver Winter Olympic Games, where it sponsored the US team and many of its high-profile athletes.
“Vancouver really proved to us that this could work. We generated $100m in incremental sales, enjoyed a market share bump and 6 billion consumer impressions,” he claims.
The new global deal allows P&G to use the Olympic rings in marketing campaigns for brands such as Pampers and Ariel. It also presents the company with the opportunity to forge partnerships with athletes from all competing nations.
Pritchard says that his marketing team are currently working on plans for its Top 50 brands “to come up with Olympic-themed ideas that will best work”. He adds they will use the experience of what worked at the Vancouver games to help them match the right athletes with the right brands.
“You look at a brand and think about the equity of that brand. For instance in Vancouver, speed skater Apolo Ohno was matched with Vicks because he is involved in a high intensity sport, while skater Tanith Belbin needs to be fearless so that is why Secret worked.”
The London Games in 2012 will present P&G with its first opportunity to work with athletes representing the host nation. Pritchard says that preliminary discussions have already taken place with British Olympic chiefs to determine what local marketing opportunities there might be.
“This [deal] allows you to reach out to those associations and identify with them the athletes that you want to sponsor. And we will certainly be looking at Team GB athletes that we want to sponsor as part of this programme,” he says.
P&G becomes the eleventh partner of the Olympic movement. The IOC has a policy of never disclosing the value of the deals it has signed with the likes of Coca-Cola, McDonalds and Visa.
Pritchard too would not be drawn on the value of the deal except to say that the partnership represents good value given the scale of the marketing potential around the five Games it will be involved in.
“These kind of events leverage the scale of our company. In many cases when you bring many brands together it is more efficient than individually, that also has a big business benefit.”







Readers' comments (4)
Sean Wijesiri | Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:35 am
The "Official Locker Room Products" strategy being used by P&G during the Olympics is undoubtedly a good move. Whereby complementing brands within your own portfolio share the same marketing space and thereby reducing your cost and maximizing exposure is going to go down well.
Smaller companies seeing this I hope will imitate this campaign and be encourage to produce more products that complement their existing offerings, thereby generating more revenue - and that has to be good for every one.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
kath o'connor | Fri, 30 Jul 2010 4:09 pm
I am disgusted that these people are being allowed to sponser a sporting event for commercial gain. Procter & Gamble are known to still be using animals to test their products this is a disgusting and barbaric act. I strongly protest against them having any kind of impact on the olympic games...i am outraged and angry...
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:02 pm
I'm disgusted that the olympics are using such an unethical company such as Procter and Gamble to sponsor them. I won't be watching the olympics and i won't be watching them ever again as they do not stand for the ethics they claim they do
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Gary DiNardo | Thu, 5 Aug 2010 7:57 pm
I wonder what kind of pressure the IOC will apply to athletes who refuse to allow them selves to be sponsored by P&G, in protest against the company's continued use of live animals to 'test' it's products.
I'm also hoping that some of them will make a big enough issue of this that P&G won't be able to hide what it's doing anymore.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment